Skip to main content

Let the games begin!

Career hazards are a part of every job. A lot of times, they make it worth the risk. If you manage to cross over, it's certainly worth it, and it makes trying (without succeeding) worth the effort. Politics, too, is a career. With the shuffle of people back and forth once they get into inner circles, it certainly isn't a vocation they just end up finding themselves lucky to do. It has prep and reward involved—all which any politician should feel guilty about as long they are doing their jobs.

And like every organisation and industry, there is competition, and not just the healthy type. Since the chances of them having a honourable merit-based in-organisation hierarchy in politics is low in India, there is  confrontation, which has now become the standard. It's like all politicians are trying their best to be champions in limbo (the game), outdoing one another when one sets a brand new low for inter-political and personal respect for colleagues and peers as humans—defamation, name calling, crass language... the list is long. There must be new methods being created right now that are not on the list. Politics can very well be a drunk weekend on the beach at The Bahamas*, like it's a good thing, when you're on the top of the pyramid and at the bottom.

Now, we all understand personal lines being crossed, that you shouldn't cross anywhere. Most of us usually keep work work and home home. Politicians still are courteous when they run into each other on the job, with a few extreme cases. But their keeping work-work soon comes with the mixing a little of home as well, for that extra leverage, and the cycle starts. They are still courteous when they run into each other on the job, while using the home attacks when best leveragable. And this isn't the recent norm. Anyone who was inspired to become a leader of the people knew that this was one of the likely hazards of the job.

So if there is a politician out there who does indeed recognise the perils of their field, they would be either very willing or weary to craft their own path with them. The last thing they should do is be surprised about them. Some even expect honourable discourse instead. Well, every bad bunch has a good bunch, and you can't generalise and justice to both. You'd think that all their experience from the bottom up would give them some spine, or just the rude shock would, by itself, but that's far from reality. Most of them are in a mid-state that they are not conscious of. The only thing they are conscious of is how much power they are heading towards. It's a never ending zombie walk unlike which you'll never see elsewhere.

Some of them really walk the talk. They either call it power play and openly play with power, or they do it with complete, sometimes innocent, sincerity, and take people in their stride. Some play the people. They pull out their crocodile tears and worst behaviour only when it helps them get even just a little closer to where they can be a part of the limbo celebration.

All we can do is to enjoy the games and hope we don't get swallowed up whole anywhere along the way. The only thing we know will get swallowed up whole is our hopes that only they can realise. Let the games, and amusement, go on!

P.S: Have you got your popcorn? While you enjoy the show, just make sure you remember to vote, and give the voice you support a shout out when you can. There just may be hope!

*In line with it being a famed island holiday destination that such a thing is likely. Can be substituted for any other favourite holiday destination.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To vote, not to vote, and how you can vote effectively

It's election time in Karnataka on the 12th of May. It's been raining political tourists, grand speeches, grander accusations and tons of mudslinging. The atmosphere can be vitiating to a simple, sincere, honest voter's spirit (which there aren't many of these days). You usually find the ones who are annoyingly over-bearing or innocently pre-decided. They either shove their opinions down your throat or are inane about any discussion about who the best candidate is, apart from their committed usual party.  For those who are conscientious voters, it is a struggle during every election. The options they have in candidates don't help them either. It's never a complete picture with any one. What one lacks in wisdom another makes up for in opportunism. Lots of questions pop up in their minds. They don't want to waste a vote, nor do they want to compain later. When balancing these options, it helps to understand what your vote could stand for.  There are cert...

Opt for the better political binary: Truth or Untruth

The world's going digital. Smart phones, AI, IT... practically everything is made easy, possible at the click of something, or at the very thought of it. It's all come down to 1's and 0's—as binary as binary can get. Sadly, this can turn into an bloody infestation where binaries don't belong, like politics. With its root beginnings themselves dubious enough, this is an added insult. This binary thinking makes us magnets who have to stick to only one side based on our polarity (which we apparently can't change). It's all involuntary, you see. It's always left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative, or capitalists vs. everybody else. Neither of two groups (whichever they be) recognise any ground in between. It's like a great abyss of death. Independent inquiry always makes you from the other side, depending on who's accusing you. You either play for the home team or the other team. One is wrong, the other right; one evil, the other p...

Sign here, please: Politics meets the big stage (2)

(Topic: Politics) Read (1) Well, politics is everywhere. When it comes into its own arena, and deals with power and governance, it takes on a new level. Till then people are just doing it on the side for ego kicks and side benefits. Once crossed over to the big leagues, the only thing different is a much, much wider playing field with the same motivation to win The science remains as is. There are some stark differences though. When otherwise practiced, there was never a referee, and there was no accountability. It is self-managed system. Sensible people rested their egos at a reasonable midpoint and accepted that there are going to be some crazy folk you can go ahead and ignore. At the next level, there is self-regulation and accountability, with the same freedom to crazy folk. It takes shape in a growing, robust swirling core of ideas fed by citizens' voices, with everything they think about where the country should be and how to get there. This is the sacred...