Let's talk about the NRC. First, a primer. The National Register of
Citizens is a list of people in Assam who are Indians citizens, leaving
out those who are not, from those who are residing, or are from, the
state. It is of political relevance because Assam has seen illegal
immigrants from Bangladesh change the Hindu-Muslim ratio in the state.
The further you probe into the history of the issue, you'll see there
are many more details that will make you understand what's true, false,
right and wrong about it. This article's topic just one side of the
issue.
The focus of this piece is on a deeper
issue: on the raw nerve it touches so callously - citizenship, otherwise
called home. Most of us were never formally introduced to home, in all
its forms: people, building, place and/or community . We just grew up
knowing one, except for the unfortunate among us. We became it and it
became us. We contribute to it like it contributed to us. We also
nurture, value and honour it the same way. So, when someone come and
pulls the rug from under our feet, it means dishonour. Much more when
it's abrupt. All that we have, that was sacredly ours, becomes lost.
Citizenship
is the face of all of this. To people who have made this modern country
home, it is everything that has been described in the above paragraph
and more. As much as citizenship is a legalistic of paper, to a
homegrown (and/or homeborn) individual, it means so much more. So when
you have whole families with one member out of the NRC, and other
ridiculous cases, your blood boils because of how callously the
Government takes what citizenship is and means. There is no comedy of
errors that is justifiable, like how they have happened. Even if
it was because it was a clerical error, or a matter of which list the
missing name was not on, why would they even? Even if you argue correction by process, how stupid do you have to be to
design a process that's best work is this in the first place? They gave screwing up a
whole new standard, and with what ease it was just passed of.
Now, India's own children (where
they be among the illegal ones) have had to be cited to prove something
that is as plain ridiculous as their home, when it's as clear as day
that they aren't. Can an entire Indian family on the list have a
Bangladeshi son who's citizenship is natural (and other such cases)? Or
do you need a special committee to answer that? As of now, the
government reserves the right and they prefer a simply insipid response.
Perhaps the people (once we all come to our senses) will give them an
equally insipid one. Till then, the few of us remain cited out of our
den, with no home zen whatsoever.
Comments
Post a Comment