Skip to main content

Are you a cite-zen?

Let's talk about the NRC. First, a primer. The National Register of Citizens is a list of people in Assam who are Indians citizens, leaving out those who are not, from those who are residing, or are from, the state. It is of political relevance because Assam has seen illegal immigrants from Bangladesh change the Hindu-Muslim ratio in the state. The further you probe into the history of the issue, you'll see there are many more details that will make you understand what's true, false, right and wrong about it. This article's topic just one side of the issue. 

The focus of this piece is on a deeper issue: on the raw nerve it touches so callously - citizenship, otherwise called home. Most of us were never formally introduced to home, in all its forms: people, building, place and/or community . We just grew up knowing one, except for the unfortunate among us. We became it and it became us. We contribute to it like it contributed to us. We also nurture, value and honour it the same way. So, when someone come and pulls the rug from under our feet, it means dishonour. Much more when it's abrupt. All that we have, that was sacredly ours, becomes lost.

Citizenship is the face of all of this. To people who have made this modern country home, it is everything that has been described in the above paragraph and more. As much as citizenship is a legalistic of paper, to a homegrown (and/or homeborn) individual, it means so much more. So when you have whole families with one member out of the NRC, and other ridiculous cases, your blood boils because of how callously the Government takes what citizenship is and means. There is no comedy of errors that is justifiable, like how they have happened. Even if it was because it was a clerical error, or a matter of which list the missing name was not on, why would they even? Even if you argue correction by process, how stupid do you have to be to design a process that's best work is this in the first place? They gave screwing up a whole new standard, and with what ease it was just passed of.

Now, India's own children (where they be among the illegal ones) have had to be cited to prove something that is as plain ridiculous as their home, when it's as clear as day that they aren't. Can an entire Indian family on the list have a Bangladeshi son who's citizenship is natural (and other such cases)? Or do you need a special committee to answer that? As of now, the government reserves the right and they prefer a simply insipid response. Perhaps the people (once we all come to our senses) will give them an equally insipid one. Till then, the few of us remain cited out of our den, with no home zen whatsoever. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sec 295(a): 295 reasons too many to take offense?

Pride before a fall, they say. The only thing they don't say is how long before the fall. Let's take a case in point. India prides itself on a lot of things. Among those are secularism and a rich & envied cultural history. We're well known for our food,  dance forms,  and indigenous sciences,  among a long list. But what about the pride this fame brings? Unfortunately,  all those who hope that the saying is true are right. It's what happened with Nupur Sharma, Munawwar Farruiqui, Mohammed Zubair and every person booked under IPC section 295A. All of these cases were filed by a random single individual and blossomed into nationwide movements. If the previous sentence doesn't call out the glaring faultline that this pride rests on, and makes it obvious, the next one will.  All it took for statements, addressing the expression of pride, by a free individual to be eligible to be counted as crime is for another such free individual, over-stuff...
Post a Comment
Read more

...and then they came for you

Sometimes it takes what seems like the wrong punch to get the right effect by an expected person - like the recent backlash by many Muslim countries about Nupur Sharma's statements on Prophet Mohammed. Just a disclaimer though: their response is not a complete defense of what many Indian Muslims go through in a stated secular country like India - whether it is by the 1976 assertion of "secular" in the Preamble or the claim that Hinduism is anyway secular making the former unnecessary. The international response is on an equal level to how many Muslims are made to face struggles at home in India. The mirror just flipped. It's all show and no substance, just with a different name.  The countries, which registered their opposition, practice a somewhat equal intolerance of beliefs other than theirs, as does the Hindutva brigade that has been on the rise in the past few months, whose words these very countries have raised an issue with. They, both, have the same cultura...
Post a Comment
Read more

Opt for the better political binary: Truth or Untruth

The world's going digital. Smart phones, AI, IT... practically everything is made easy, possible at the click of something, or at the very thought of it. It's all come down to 1's and 0's—as binary as binary can get. Sadly, this can turn into an bloody infestation where binaries don't belong, like politics. With its root beginnings themselves dubious enough, this is an added insult. This binary thinking makes us magnets who have to stick to only one side based on our polarity (which we apparently can't change). It's all involuntary, you see. It's always left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative, or capitalists vs. everybody else. Neither of two groups (whichever they be) recognise any ground in between. It's like a great abyss of death. Independent inquiry always makes you from the other side, depending on who's accusing you. You either play for the home team or the other team. One is wrong, the other right; one evil, the other p...
1 comment
Read more