Skip to main content

When country meets home

Nationalism is irrationalizable, undebatable and sacred even if lacking at times. It's a whole religion by itself. Unlike working up to it, with reasons why it must exist, it is blindly assumed and then dictates how you behave towards it. See, I get it. This is nationalism - nation, people, country, culture, roots and those who protect it and ensure it stays intact. There's a sort of a natal attachment to it which even the most reasoning naysayers can't deny. But, can it really allowed to flourish, as freely as it does? Are all the ideas it entails paying the right homage, even if not reasonable or completely open-eyed, to the core concept?

When you're trying to explain something for better clarity, it's normal to take an example outside of the argument's purview to make your point, it being a comparison. Sometimes you hit a roadblock when someone tells you that"'it's not like that. You won't understand", which defeats the whole purpose. The entire goal is to try to understand it by relating the idea to something similar and hopefully find a similar paradigm and make better sense of it. Of course, people do have a right to abide by the ideas that they wish to, even if they don't add up.

It would seem that we need a new paradigm to understand it better. Let me suggest one. Home. If you're confused, don't worry. I'll have your attention soon enough. Home, like your home, or your house. Now, you grew up in your home, just the way you grew up in India, the cause of our nationalism. In either case, you belong, are from, and identify with nowhere else. It's your primary identity - where you're from. If it was revoked you'd be homeless with no other place that is home to you.

Being born in that place, you also make that place. As miniscule or large as it may be, the evolution of your home over the years is something that you, by default, build. The place is you and you are it, equally along with every other member. You were born in it. You will die in it. You will also take charge of it and lead it forward as it reflects the way you and its other members evolve. You own it, equally. You owe it no favours for any kind of privilege of calling home. It would be never be that very home, today, without you.

Ditto with your country. You have been born and bred an Indian by chance of it being your home. You were not "raised" by India. You weren't homeless and in the dumps when Bharat Mata 'gave' you a home you didn't even deserve to begin with, which you should be adversely grateful for. You are India and this is your home with all the rights that come along with it.

In your home, you are brought up in a particular tradition and culture when you are young, which becomes your primary experience. As you grow up and think for yourself, you ideally choose between various degrees of *honouring that tradition because it becomes your own honour, questioning it to align it relevantly with your growing identity as a person and the better principles of life as you discover them, or simply keeping it a religious distance and showed as much general respect as you can to your heritage. In case you aren't allowed one of these options in your home, **your mind hasn't been allowed to make itself up freely and you exercise an unfree mindset that you have not chosen and don't question for the better.

Ditto with your country. You could be bred in India but you don't have to agree with the way you were brought up. It's your India to change or keep and you don't need a majority vote on that. By making your choice and exercising the views and actions that come along with it, you do that everyday! The update happens real-time.

The nationalist view is best defined by *first or **fourth response to what we were taught and told. Those who hold it aren't open to an open mind about home and country and the gates of their ideas about it are shut. If country is indeed home, it gives us far more freedom that they'd like to think they and us should have: far more freedom that their closed minds can clearly handle.

Regardless of your choice, you never diss your home unless you are woke enough to address what you see is wrong about it. Saying what you think is wrong about it, just as equally as someone has the right to think otherwise, isn't dissing your home. You say what you say because you believe it needs to be woken up. The ones who disagree don't have to agree with you and it's your home, still. Even if you were, if it was a home given to you, it comes with all those rights. Once it's home to someone new who isn't born there too, those rights follow. Ditto with your country.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To vote, not to vote, and how you can vote effectively

It's election time in Karnataka on the 12th of May. It's been raining political tourists, grand speeches, grander accusations and tons of mudslinging. The atmosphere can be vitiating to a simple, sincere, honest voter's spirit (which there aren't many of these days). You usually find the ones who are annoyingly over-bearing or innocently pre-decided. They either shove their opinions down your throat or are inane about any discussion about who the best candidate is, apart from their committed usual party.  For those who are conscientious voters, it is a struggle during every election. The options they have in candidates don't help them either. It's never a complete picture with any one. What one lacks in wisdom another makes up for in opportunism. Lots of questions pop up in their minds. They don't want to waste a vote, nor do they want to compain later. When balancing these options, it helps to understand what your vote could stand for.  There are cert

Sign here, please: Politics meets the big stage (2)

(Topic: Politics) Read (1) Well, politics is everywhere. When it comes into its own arena, and deals with power and governance, it takes on a new level. Till then people are just doing it on the side for ego kicks and side benefits. Once crossed over to the big leagues, the only thing different is a much, much wider playing field with the same motivation to win The science remains as is. There are some stark differences though. When otherwise practiced, there was never a referee, and there was no accountability. It is self-managed system. Sensible people rested their egos at a reasonable midpoint and accepted that there are going to be some crazy folk you can go ahead and ignore. At the next level, there is self-regulation and accountability, with the same freedom to crazy folk. It takes shape in a growing, robust swirling core of ideas fed by citizens' voices, with everything they think about where the country should be and how to get there. This is the sacred space tha

The Modern Indian Politician's rule book

Nowadays politics is a hard game but that doesn't mean everyone who gets in bypasses the merit test. When power's in play, the human is spurred to get their bite. And since it's full up and there's way more competition than just the top layer you see, there is an intermediate dynamic that has driven and taught people a few survival tactics. It's almost become like a call centre employee rule response guide that can sometimes be hilarious and true, at the same time. Note: we're saying nothing about how much sense they make or whether they should even be endorsed. Here are just some of the entries you'd find in there. Foot-in-mouth: This is suggested when you need to a big presence but you don't have one. Just go for it. The limelight is far more important. Your intelligence may see some sunlight but that's alright. Don't let that bother you. Just go straight back into your hole after. The thumb rule is to get all the attention you need from a pa