Skip to main content

From our wounds, we must heal

We've just turned a new leaf in India's history that closed one wound with the building of a temple. Like every other, this one redeemed itself, but in the process, it festered another - innocently, of course. As much as wounds need to be healed, we also need to recognise that it is wounds that cause other wounds in a perpetual cycle that we've set off for generations and decades now. The world has come far, in pain and time, with history repeating itself in bigger cycles than the last, on and on. 

Pain inspires justice; by that, I mean vengeance. And that inspires violence, which gives us these wounds. All this is because what we need is healing, and that's the only thing we never seek. 

Wounds can be of many kinds - the death of a loved one (or people), continuous cultural oppression, being robbed of identity and/or dignity, preventing people from opportunity, etc. Each wound is, first, personal, then multiplied by the community that feels it. For this, vengeance is natural. We tend to equate it to justice like blood for blood, eye for eye and hand for hand, but let's clearly identify the markers. 

Vengeance is about you (individually) and how you feel. It stops and ends there, feel being the keyword. It is momentary, if achieved, and doesn't resurrect what was lost. Justice is less about how you feel. It has a larger effect in light of the fact that many other people also have cause to feel this way. It looks at preventing the same thing from happening again to anyone else in the future - both by punishment for the responsible and/or restitution for the victim.  

Any wound will always be tragic and wrong. When we move from feelings to reality, we must accept that the loss of certain things will remain painful, how much ever we avenge them. The dead can't be brought back to life, and nothing else with ever be a substitute for the real thing. The pain stays, but unfortunately, we can't get back time. At best, we can address how to avoid this in the future. We can protect people's rights against similar loss. 

Instead of responding how we do, we get stuck in a loop of pain where someone keeps getting hurt and causes hurt in retaliation (hoping to address it). But there is reconciliation only in going past our loss, for our own good before we tackle the injustice for the good of everyone, once our motives to avenge die out—moving from self-centered vengeance to justice for everyone. 

In other words, we need to heal inside. 

Once done (or once we're well on our way in), we can address the issue without superimposing our pain over everyone else's and talk about true justice and not vengeance in its name. 

Most of us experience some loss, which we can't get back, like people who have died. When it comes to those that we can (e.g. cultural or religious power/rights), we need to do an ours vs. theirs check. Most times, this is a result of a power play between the two sides. We've innocently inherited our privilege, as much as someone else has lost out on them. It's entirely possible that we grew up with these privileges as our own identity when someone else should have had a lot more of it - only because their ancestors suffered, directly or indirectly, when our ancestors' took, or kept, that from them many moons ago.   

But we are not our parents' keepers, but those privileges are still us, i.e. our identity - the very reason we judtify fighting each other in a loop. It's natural for us to defend them to death.  We carry them forward in the process, creating the future. If ever, reconciliation can only happen when we understand which side of the fence we are on and see if we can help the other side up. Even if we can't trace the power play, we will be able to see the inequality - which we can correct by leveling it. That should not necessarily mean giving up what we have but destroying the walls of discrimination and bias that allowed them to, and some things to make up for lost time.

In the process of opening the doors to those on the other side of the fence, we will find something astonishing, maybe: that we are not all that different at all. Our differences only hide our similarities. We're reaching out for the same things, but just in very different ways. We shouldn't idolize our different identities beyond what makes us all the same in what we want, need and desire. 

If we don't break this loop, we inevitably deem everyone but ourselves as worthy of these things, when we all deserve them equally. That is the only discrimination that we need to avoid. From our wounds, we must rise above and heal. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To vote, not to vote, and how you can vote effectively

It's election time in Karnataka on the 12th of May. It's been raining political tourists, grand speeches, grander accusations and tons of mudslinging. The atmosphere can be vitiating to a simple, sincere, honest voter's spirit (which there aren't many of these days). You usually find the ones who are annoyingly over-bearing or innocently pre-decided. They either shove their opinions down your throat or are inane about any discussion about who the best candidate is, apart from their committed usual party.  For those who are conscientious voters, it is a struggle during every election. The options they have in candidates don't help them either. It's never a complete picture with any one. What one lacks in wisdom another makes up for in opportunism. Lots of questions pop up in their minds. They don't want to waste a vote, nor do they want to compain later. When balancing these options, it helps to understand what your vote could stand for.  There are cert

Sign here, please: Politics meets the big stage (2)

(Topic: Politics) Read (1) Well, politics is everywhere. When it comes into its own arena, and deals with power and governance, it takes on a new level. Till then people are just doing it on the side for ego kicks and side benefits. Once crossed over to the big leagues, the only thing different is a much, much wider playing field with the same motivation to win The science remains as is. There are some stark differences though. When otherwise practiced, there was never a referee, and there was no accountability. It is self-managed system. Sensible people rested their egos at a reasonable midpoint and accepted that there are going to be some crazy folk you can go ahead and ignore. At the next level, there is self-regulation and accountability, with the same freedom to crazy folk. It takes shape in a growing, robust swirling core of ideas fed by citizens' voices, with everything they think about where the country should be and how to get there. This is the sacred space tha

The Modern Indian Politician's rule book

Nowadays politics is a hard game but that doesn't mean everyone who gets in bypasses the merit test. When power's in play, the human is spurred to get their bite. And since it's full up and there's way more competition than just the top layer you see, there is an intermediate dynamic that has driven and taught people a few survival tactics. It's almost become like a call centre employee rule response guide that can sometimes be hilarious and true, at the same time. Note: we're saying nothing about how much sense they make or whether they should even be endorsed. Here are just some of the entries you'd find in there. Foot-in-mouth: This is suggested when you need to a big presence but you don't have one. Just go for it. The limelight is far more important. Your intelligence may see some sunlight but that's alright. Don't let that bother you. Just go straight back into your hole after. The thumb rule is to get all the attention you need from a pa