Skip to main content

...and then they came for you

Sometimes it takes what seems like the wrong punch to get the right effect by an expected person - like the recent backlash by many Muslim countries about Nupur Sharma's statements on Prophet Mohammed. Just a disclaimer though: their response is not a complete defense of what many Indian Muslims go through in a stated secular country like India - whether it is by the 1976 assertion of "secular" in the Preamble or the claim that Hinduism is anyway secular making the former unnecessary. The international response is on an equal level to how many Muslims are made to face struggles at home in India. The mirror just flipped. It's all show and no substance, just with a different name. 

The countries, which registered their opposition, practice a somewhat equal intolerance of beliefs other than theirs, as does the Hindutva brigade that has been on the rise in the past few months, whose words these very countries have raised an issue with. They, both, have the same cultural and/or religious motivation to do but are just on opposite ends of the same spectrum of religious intolerance. 

The fact that it took this particular outrage from lands far away when there was enough noise being raised back home speaks for the true heart of the majority rulers of this country. As some tweets went, oil is indeed thicker than water. The Government couldn't care any less for their own but will do anything for their economic lifelines. It's another matter that they've brought the country to a point that it needs so much dependence on lifelines. It's also a separate matter that Governments usually don't care unless you are a pawn they can use. 

Of course, all is not well back at home even with the Government's own supporters up in arms about them bowing down to greater powers. Many supporters are angry that they caved but perhaps they should understand that their loyalty was never seen as loyalty but just convenient steps up towards the Government's goal. It's tragic that they are surprised. 

What best describes this is the poem by Martin Niemöller which describes this phenomenon that people should not be surprised by anymore - but they still choose to be. 

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist

Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist

Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist

Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew

Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

The last stanza is for the Hindutva loyal gang that is angry with the Government appeasing, which also supports, or ignores, the strong anti-Muslim sentiment prevalent in many places. They didn't realize that like, any other political movement, their 'loyalty' only makes them pawns in the game - like everyone under a government today. They are not any leadership's first priority and all leaderships are usually as selfish as the previous one. They were happy at Muslims being pawns that had no more use because they weren't pawns (yet) but now their time has come and it's a revelation they can't handle. 

The lesson to learn here is that if you want someone to speak out for you when they come for you, you should also speak out for them, when they come for them. A simpler way to say that is to speak up for everyone when and how you can - whether it's on social media or what you silently believe and never say but becomes your vote. Also, ideological loyalty to people and individuals will always sting you in the back. You protect your own and you help other people protect their own while we all strive for a world in which everyone doesn't have to protect their own. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Opt for the better political binary: Truth or Untruth

The world's going digital. Smart phones, AI, IT... practically everything is made easy, possible at the click of something, or at the very thought of it. It's all come down to 1's and 0's—as binary as binary can get. Sadly, this can turn into an bloody infestation where binaries don't belong, like politics. With its root beginnings themselves dubious enough, this is an added insult. This binary thinking makes us magnets who have to stick to only one side based on our polarity (which we apparently can't change). It's all involuntary, you see. It's always left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative, or capitalists vs. everybody else. Neither of two groups (whichever they be) recognise any ground in between. It's like a great abyss of death. Independent inquiry always makes you from the other side, depending on who's accusing you. You either play for the home team or the other team. One is wrong, the other right; one evil, the other p...

Does your politics make you a pig?

Time, despite the inevitable changes, needs a few constants otherwise we lose ourselves, like manners i.e. civility, grace, respect - that age-old value that can seem really old school sometimes. The manners that maketh the man, they say. They also mark the man apart by miles from those people with lesser or, worse, none of this standard. This golden role can be offered no excuse, none at all. The problem, however, arises with the ongoing intense political age where person and politics know no boundaries. Intentional politicking usually involves supporting one side in total, including its bad parts, to avoid the fallouts of the other side(s) in total to achieve the best world possible yet. Depending on how desperate you are for that world, reason starts to fade, irrationality takes its place and you can't make out the difference between the two.  That's when you lose the manners that maketh you. Name-calling, condescending, patronizing and other collectively influenced adverse...