Skip to main content

The nationalism conversation you never had (but it's never too late either)

Let me open with: Between the two—being Indian or being from your home town, what are you (if one had to be right and the other wrong)? The catch: One is true, automatically making the other one false. In my case, it will be Am I Indian, or am I Bengalurian? Chances are that the one that's true will have to be I am Bengalurian. Being Bengalurian first makes me Indian as much as being from Dusseldorf or Reykjavik doesn't, and being from Pune, Delhi, or any place in today's India makes someone else Indian. If you're still confused, get your probability calculators out and figure that one out. 

That the case, being Indian has to, therefore, be a sum total of being a Bengalurian, Dilliwalla, Kolkatan, <every single Indian place with people>...n.  This exhaustive list incorporates every element of life including food, lifestyle, religion, social values etc. that each of these people live by, even those that don't make the common majority of what that collectively involves. It is also, more importantly, a bottom up structure implying what India is, rather than telling us what we should be - essentially a non-interfering model. It's impossible to not be Indian if India is where you're from and you live as you please, unless you are being a general nuisance or causing a fall of law and order. There's nothing you specifically have to do to earn the tag. It's simply everything you are.

Overtime, we've turned it around. When our strength should be respecting uncommon differences, we've established mainstream, ignoring them. The larger, louder majority gets to define and regulate cultural rights and wrongs especially with respect to language and nationalism. A true idea of India serves each one of us. Now, the lesser different among us must serve this strange idea of India. It doesn't really add up and become relatable, if it doesn't really represent you. 

Nation pride is merely a habit. All the home dynamics play out there exactly as it does at home. It is also an economic construct, a necessary one so it can sustain a country. It should not be understood beyond this. Your country may or may not be the best country in the world. It will not be everyone else's to love as much their own countries. You can call it out its ills for what they are without intending for it to look bad when your only other option is to let it be as bad as it is. 

The nationalism model you follow must not be a blindfold that doesn't let you reason. There is nothing sacred about nation and country that you should not ever be able to question. The fears of those who reject this idea are unfounded. They refuse to recognise the uncommon differences of those to whom else their country is home. Their solace should be that home is home and it becomes a way of life that is meant to make, build and benefit us, which it doesn't always. Questioning removes the oppression - making it a good thing. As matter of fact, nationalism should be self questioning and critical. That's how your national heroes aren't turned into god men and your ideas into sacred idols.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sec 295(a): 295 reasons too many to take offense?

Pride before a fall, they say. The only thing they don't say is how long before the fall. Let's take a case in point. India prides itself on a lot of things. Among those are secularism and a rich & envied cultural history. We're well known for our food,  dance forms,  and indigenous sciences,  among a long list. But what about the pride this fame brings? Unfortunately,  all those who hope that the saying is true are right. It's what happened with Nupur Sharma, Munawwar Farruiqui, Mohammed Zubair and every person booked under IPC section 295A. All of these cases were filed by a random single individual and blossomed into nationwide movements. If the previous sentence doesn't call out the glaring faultline that this pride rests on, and makes it obvious, the next one will.  All it took for statements, addressing the expression of pride, by a free individual to be eligible to be counted as crime is for another such free individual, over-stuff...
Post a Comment
Read more

Opt for the better political binary: Truth or Untruth

The world's going digital. Smart phones, AI, IT... practically everything is made easy, possible at the click of something, or at the very thought of it. It's all come down to 1's and 0's—as binary as binary can get. Sadly, this can turn into an bloody infestation where binaries don't belong, like politics. With its root beginnings themselves dubious enough, this is an added insult. This binary thinking makes us magnets who have to stick to only one side based on our polarity (which we apparently can't change). It's all involuntary, you see. It's always left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative, or capitalists vs. everybody else. Neither of two groups (whichever they be) recognise any ground in between. It's like a great abyss of death. Independent inquiry always makes you from the other side, depending on who's accusing you. You either play for the home team or the other team. One is wrong, the other right; one evil, the other p...
1 comment
Read more

...and then they came for you

Sometimes it takes what seems like the wrong punch to get the right effect by an expected person - like the recent backlash by many Muslim countries about Nupur Sharma's statements on Prophet Mohammed. Just a disclaimer though: their response is not a complete defense of what many Indian Muslims go through in a stated secular country like India - whether it is by the 1976 assertion of "secular" in the Preamble or the claim that Hinduism is anyway secular making the former unnecessary. The international response is on an equal level to how many Muslims are made to face struggles at home in India. The mirror just flipped. It's all show and no substance, just with a different name.  The countries, which registered their opposition, practice a somewhat equal intolerance of beliefs other than theirs, as does the Hindutva brigade that has been on the rise in the past few months, whose words these very countries have raised an issue with. They, both, have the same cultura...
Post a Comment
Read more