Skip to main content

Let the games begin!

Career hazards are a part of every job. A lot of times, they make it worth the risk. If you manage to cross over, it's certainly worth it, and it makes trying (without succeeding) worth the effort. Politics, too, is a career. With the shuffle of people back and forth once they get into inner circles, it certainly isn't a vocation they just end up finding themselves lucky to do. It has prep and reward involved—all which any politician should feel guilty about as long they are doing their jobs.

And like every organisation and industry, there is competition, and not just the healthy type. Since the chances of them having a honourable merit-based in-organisation hierarchy in politics is low in India, there is  confrontation, which has now become the standard. It's like all politicians are trying their best to be champions in limbo (the game), outdoing one another when one sets a brand new low for inter-political and personal respect for colleagues and peers as humans—defamation, name calling, crass language... the list is long. There must be new methods being created right now that are not on the list. Politics can very well be a drunk weekend on the beach at The Bahamas*, like it's a good thing, when you're on the top of the pyramid and at the bottom.

Now, we all understand personal lines being crossed, that you shouldn't cross anywhere. Most of us usually keep work work and home home. Politicians still are courteous when they run into each other on the job, with a few extreme cases. But their keeping work-work soon comes with the mixing a little of home as well, for that extra leverage, and the cycle starts. They are still courteous when they run into each other on the job, while using the home attacks when best leveragable. And this isn't the recent norm. Anyone who was inspired to become a leader of the people knew that this was one of the likely hazards of the job.

So if there is a politician out there who does indeed recognise the perils of their field, they would be either very willing or weary to craft their own path with them. The last thing they should do is be surprised about them. Some even expect honourable discourse instead. Well, every bad bunch has a good bunch, and you can't generalise and justice to both. You'd think that all their experience from the bottom up would give them some spine, or just the rude shock would, by itself, but that's far from reality. Most of them are in a mid-state that they are not conscious of. The only thing they are conscious of is how much power they are heading towards. It's a never ending zombie walk unlike which you'll never see elsewhere.

Some of them really walk the talk. They either call it power play and openly play with power, or they do it with complete, sometimes innocent, sincerity, and take people in their stride. Some play the people. They pull out their crocodile tears and worst behaviour only when it helps them get even just a little closer to where they can be a part of the limbo celebration.

All we can do is to enjoy the games and hope we don't get swallowed up whole anywhere along the way. The only thing we know will get swallowed up whole is our hopes that only they can realise. Let the games, and amusement, go on!

P.S: Have you got your popcorn? While you enjoy the show, just make sure you remember to vote, and give the voice you support a shout out when you can. There just may be hope!

*In line with it being a famed island holiday destination that such a thing is likely. Can be substituted for any other favourite holiday destination.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Opt for the better political binary: Truth or Untruth

The world's going digital. Smart phones, AI, IT... practically everything is made easy, possible at the click of something, or at the very thought of it. It's all come down to 1's and 0's—as binary as binary can get. Sadly, this can turn into an bloody infestation where binaries don't belong, like politics. With its root beginnings themselves dubious enough, this is an added insult. This binary thinking makes us magnets who have to stick to only one side based on our polarity (which we apparently can't change). It's all involuntary, you see. It's always left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative, or capitalists vs. everybody else. Neither of two groups (whichever they be) recognise any ground in between. It's like a great abyss of death. Independent inquiry always makes you from the other side, depending on who's accusing you. You either play for the home team or the other team. One is wrong, the other right; one evil, the other p...

Does your politics make you a pig?

Time, despite the inevitable changes, needs a few constants otherwise we lose ourselves, like manners i.e. civility, grace, respect - that age-old value that can seem really old school sometimes. The manners that maketh the man, they say. They also mark the man apart by miles from those people with lesser or, worse, none of this standard. This golden role can be offered no excuse, none at all. The problem, however, arises with the ongoing intense political age where person and politics know no boundaries. Intentional politicking usually involves supporting one side in total, including its bad parts, to avoid the fallouts of the other side(s) in total to achieve the best world possible yet. Depending on how desperate you are for that world, reason starts to fade, irrationality takes its place and you can't make out the difference between the two.  That's when you lose the manners that maketh you. Name-calling, condescending, patronizing and other collectively influenced adverse...

...and then they came for you

Sometimes it takes what seems like the wrong punch to get the right effect by an expected person - like the recent backlash by many Muslim countries about Nupur Sharma's statements on Prophet Mohammed. Just a disclaimer though: their response is not a complete defense of what many Indian Muslims go through in a stated secular country like India - whether it is by the 1976 assertion of "secular" in the Preamble or the claim that Hinduism is anyway secular making the former unnecessary. The international response is on an equal level to how many Muslims are made to face struggles at home in India. The mirror just flipped. It's all show and no substance, just with a different name.  The countries, which registered their opposition, practice a somewhat equal intolerance of beliefs other than theirs, as does the Hindutva brigade that has been on the rise in the past few months, whose words these very countries have raised an issue with. They, both, have the same cultura...