Skip to main content

The 5 truths of happy people and country

In a troubling time, where culture is playing kingpin and zeal is going for the over-kill, it is a good time for a full reminder of what place each element has in the mix. There are five major truths that create stable, sensible people and country.

The sole goal is individual happiness 

Society must enable every individual toward this end

Government, a mirror of society, ensure this is in spirit and letter 

Nation must not replace Home

Consent on awareness is absolute

Before I unravel them, there's an all-important preface: Home. Home is the sacred temple. It is an individual phenomenon that every person has an unquestionable right to practice and honour. It is everything we are, from the language we speak to the food we eat to the religion we practice to the values we practice to our sensitivities. Collectively, it is the first lab of humanity, and different for everyone with a lot of partial and whole overlapping that occurs - in either very large groups or much smaller ones.    

I

Individual Happiness is the ultimate goal of all life. Life is at its best when everyone seeks their own individual happiness in all its forms-personal goals to family ones, while respecting and supporting everyone else's right and effort to do the same. When this is achieved, the world is balanced.  

P.S.:- Home freely spills into and defines it.  

II

Society is formed when people come together and it can pose challenges to achieving Individual Happiness. The impediment: Home differs for many groups of members, there isn't space for every variety and the non-majority get the boot leaving them voiceless, unheard and cut off within the crowd. Completely healthy society removes all challenges to realizing Individual Happiness. 

P.S.:- Society, with its majoritarian tendencies, holds power and sway, a lot of times even over Law itself.   

III

Government, a functional representation of society, can ensure access to Individual Happiness through the rule of Law. If political will is otherwise, it simply be a mirror of a majoritarian society and just reinforce majority another time over. 

P.S.:- The equation that ensures democracy though elections isn't close to near perfect; true democracy isn't a simple mathematical majority. Instead of 50.1 standing to lose voice over 49.9, rendering them unheard, we could simply dedicate the whole percentage of seats to a whole party and have people elect representatives to cover that percentage of seats in a second round of voting. It's not an immediately executable idea, but it's a start to the right direction of discussion. 

IV

If we're sticking to the original dream of everyone achieving Individual Happiness, then Nation has to be non-majoritarian. It has to be nonrestrictive to the individuals who aren't the majority and restricted too. 

P.S.:- Since we're talking about Home, we need to define family (citizens) first. One definition is anyone who is from India i.e. natives by birth or direct lineage. We sometimes like to troublesomely define this by saying that, being Indian, they must also embrace everything majoritarianly Indian directly defying the unquestionable right to practice and honour what is Home to one (given our diversity) and instead imposing what is Home to the majority other as the "right" version if we are 'Indian enough to be Indian'. Anyone sensible enough to do this is also sensible enough to deny their own sworn country's diversity by calling any such people "anti-national" and the likes. Nation can never be competition to Home, and Nation must oblige and include it. If Individuals make Nations, and Home makes Individuals, then Home(s) define Nation, with superior emphasis.

V

Consent is not something we're asked when we are brought into this world. We are signed for a lot of things that we reject once we become aware, including those about Nation and Loyalty. If Individual Happiness is where we're heading to, it shouldn't be blocked. We should be able to exercise that Consent and opt out of them, or (if we can't, thanks to Society) openly hold and air our views about them.  

P.S.:- Doing so doesn't make anyone disloyal or ungrateful. Individual Happiness is the ultimate goal, even if we don't consent to our own Home. Like Society, Government and Nation, Home must not hinder Individual Happiness. We must be free to make Individual Happiness Home unquestioned, while fighting, respecting and supporting all others to do it without barriers too. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Opt for the better political binary: Truth or Untruth

The world's going digital. Smart phones, AI, IT... practically everything is made easy, possible at the click of something, or at the very thought of it. It's all come down to 1's and 0's—as binary as binary can get. Sadly, this can turn into an bloody infestation where binaries don't belong, like politics. With its root beginnings themselves dubious enough, this is an added insult. This binary thinking makes us magnets who have to stick to only one side based on our polarity (which we apparently can't change). It's all involuntary, you see. It's always left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative, or capitalists vs. everybody else. Neither of two groups (whichever they be) recognise any ground in between. It's like a great abyss of death. Independent inquiry always makes you from the other side, depending on who's accusing you. You either play for the home team or the other team. One is wrong, the other right; one evil, the other p...
1 comment
Read more

Does your politics make you a pig?

Time, despite the inevitable changes, needs a few constants otherwise we lose ourselves, like manners i.e. civility, grace, respect - that age-old value that can seem really old school sometimes. The manners that maketh the man, they say. They also mark the man apart by miles from those people with lesser or, worse, none of this standard. This golden role can be offered no excuse, none at all. The problem, however, arises with the ongoing intense political age where person and politics know no boundaries. Intentional politicking usually involves supporting one side in total, including its bad parts, to avoid the fallouts of the other side(s) in total to achieve the best world possible yet. Depending on how desperate you are for that world, reason starts to fade, irrationality takes its place and you can't make out the difference between the two.  That's when you lose the manners that maketh you. Name-calling, condescending, patronizing and other collectively influenced adverse...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sec 295(a): 295 reasons too many to take offense?

Pride before a fall, they say. The only thing they don't say is how long before the fall. Let's take a case in point. India prides itself on a lot of things. Among those are secularism and a rich & envied cultural history. We're well known for our food,  dance forms,  and indigenous sciences,  among a long list. But what about the pride this fame brings? Unfortunately,  all those who hope that the saying is true are right. It's what happened with Nupur Sharma, Munawwar Farruiqui, Mohammed Zubair and every person booked under IPC section 295A. All of these cases were filed by a random single individual and blossomed into nationwide movements. If the previous sentence doesn't call out the glaring faultline that this pride rests on, and makes it obvious, the next one will.  All it took for statements, addressing the expression of pride, by a free individual to be eligible to be counted as crime is for another such free individual, over-stuff...
Post a Comment
Read more