Skip to main content

Forgive them for they know not what they do (before you fight back)

As we speak, the world is getting terribly polarised everywhere. We are stretching our capacity for ideologies and beliefs to incredible extents, letting the cracks speak more than our views themselves. We're creating islands and we're not even trying to build bridges between them. This is making the ideas in our heads increasingly idealistic. 

It's worth taking a step back and just, for a moment, consider what brought us here. Is it the pressure that blew, pent up for all those decades and centuries, that it just had to blow? Are our differences really worth it? Let's delve in without trying to set everybody else on fire for not aligning with what we hold true.

We need to understand, first, that all political views begin with identity, which is why we are so vehement about them. When someone's against you, it's like they are being denied a part of what is essentially, undeniably, and unarguably themselves. It's as sacred as anything can get. Even if a set of views don't actually take away any of their freedoms, they are taking away their potential to exist in the way they are and choose to be. This Identity is also a (relative) definer of truth. Any view that's opposite to theirs hints at their truth being wrong and their dentity just won't have it. It, otherwise, wouldn't be worth following as much.

The second thing we need to understand is that identity is (for most) defined by power. We get our identity depending on which side of the fence we historically fall on - both individuals and community. In that sense, identity can be a privilege or a curse. And if you're the better off, you spend all your life defending it. If not, the less said the better. Sometimes, the mere pride you get to flaunt isn't enough.  As they say, it's lonely on the top and that gets to the head. You need an "other" to make the kick that flaunting delivers worth it. That bring us to the others - the worse off. 

The worse off are always in the shadows. The better off aren't responsible for what their ancestors collectively made of them (ending up on their side of the fence). They just carry it forward instinctively, and collectively, without blinking an eye lid, finding ways to make the others their own personal court jesters when they're not ignoring and dismissing them. They believe that when equality became a thing (after it was fought for, if it was won), it demolished that fence. And, then, all those decades, centuries and possibly millennia of oppression just vanished in that instant, and now all's perfectly well. The better off have no idea of the lack of privilege that they never had. They'll never know the pain the negative multiplication of various factors - poverty, discrimination, lack of opportunity, oppression, being trampled on and more - of every kind, across generations, which is a chain that has never stopped. They only know the truth of plenty, at least access. 

Thus, all humans fall into either of these two categories - the powerful and over-powered i.e. the better off and the worse off. Both are not complicit in how they got there. They were not party to the power play that preceded their individual privileges and defined their identity. But they are party to what happens under their watch that will define the future generation. They can stop the chain, or derail it, only if they have that power. 

To do this, individuals and communities have to identify their power status, each. For those worse off, it's easy. They live, breathe and choke on it everyday. They'd derail it at the first chance they'd get, if they could. The onus of change lies on the powerful - the better off, if they'd only step up and identify the bug. Their comfort is the others' pain. They survive of blood that would not belong to them in a world where power is obsolete. That's why such a world is the only solution available. 

But it won't go away that easy, if it is going to go away at all. The problem is that they, themselves, are the bug. Power is them and they are the power. Take it away and you'd be asking for them to vanish because that's everything they are - even when it's nothing they did to fall on their side of the fence and inherit it. Soon enough, everything becomes emotional. Any sliver of chance that they spot the bug in themselves is lost. You don't convince your oppressor by speaking to their morality. There is no easy way out of this tussle between the pulling and the pushing. The only thing that's for certain is that it will go on till there's a victor and no one's inclined to give up, give in or cease fire.

While we are pushing our edges more with time, we need to understand the key to why we disagree so much, and that whatever we fight about is about who we are, essentially. We are being ourselves perfectly as we exercise it our power statuses, which is the problem. You shouldn't expect any less from anyone who hasn't been educated or exposed beyond the comfort of their immediate world and culture. If the best hearted humans saw aliens in person, they would be racist to them too. That's the ideal instinctive response. But those who have had the opportunity of educating and exposing themselves beyond their own little world have the knowledge to go beyond their instincts and act like they know better. When you don't still, change is still coming, but a long way off. 

When it's the powerful vs. the powerless, depending on your local context it can be colour vs. better colour, race vs. superior race, ethnicity vs. other ethnicity, people vs. different people, and privilege vs. lack of it. Remember that with the powerful, you have to first forgive them for they know not what they do. Truly. That's before you call out the bullshit and fight back.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To vote, not to vote, and how you can vote effectively

It's election time in Karnataka on the 12th of May. It's been raining political tourists, grand speeches, grander accusations and tons of mudslinging. The atmosphere can be vitiating to a simple, sincere, honest voter's spirit (which there aren't many of these days). You usually find the ones who are annoyingly over-bearing or innocently pre-decided. They either shove their opinions down your throat or are inane about any discussion about who the best candidate is, apart from their committed usual party.  For those who are conscientious voters, it is a struggle during every election. The options they have in candidates don't help them either. It's never a complete picture with any one. What one lacks in wisdom another makes up for in opportunism. Lots of questions pop up in their minds. They don't want to waste a vote, nor do they want to compain later. When balancing these options, it helps to understand what your vote could stand for.  There are cert

Sign here, please: Politics meets the big stage (2)

(Topic: Politics) Read (1) Well, politics is everywhere. When it comes into its own arena, and deals with power and governance, it takes on a new level. Till then people are just doing it on the side for ego kicks and side benefits. Once crossed over to the big leagues, the only thing different is a much, much wider playing field with the same motivation to win The science remains as is. There are some stark differences though. When otherwise practiced, there was never a referee, and there was no accountability. It is self-managed system. Sensible people rested their egos at a reasonable midpoint and accepted that there are going to be some crazy folk you can go ahead and ignore. At the next level, there is self-regulation and accountability, with the same freedom to crazy folk. It takes shape in a growing, robust swirling core of ideas fed by citizens' voices, with everything they think about where the country should be and how to get there. This is the sacred space tha

The Modern Indian Politician's rule book

Nowadays politics is a hard game but that doesn't mean everyone who gets in bypasses the merit test. When power's in play, the human is spurred to get their bite. And since it's full up and there's way more competition than just the top layer you see, there is an intermediate dynamic that has driven and taught people a few survival tactics. It's almost become like a call centre employee rule response guide that can sometimes be hilarious and true, at the same time. Note: we're saying nothing about how much sense they make or whether they should even be endorsed. Here are just some of the entries you'd find in there. Foot-in-mouth: This is suggested when you need to a big presence but you don't have one. Just go for it. The limelight is far more important. Your intelligence may see some sunlight but that's alright. Don't let that bother you. Just go straight back into your hole after. The thumb rule is to get all the attention you need from a pa